Building a Scalable EMR App for Tech-Enabled Services

Building an EMR for your tech-enabled healthcare practice requires navigating complex platform decisions, regulatory requirements, and integration challenges while maintaining focus on clinical excellence and national scalability. This comprehensive guide examines the strategic choices, vendor partnerships, and implementation pathways that determine whether your EMR becomes a competitive advantage or a costly distraction.

‍

The modern healthtech landscape offers unprecedented opportunities to leverage existing platforms rather than rebuilding healthcare infrastructure from scratch. Success depends on selecting the right foundation, understanding regulatory pathways, and building strategic integrations that enable scale while maintaining compliance and clinical quality.

‍

Strategic Platform Selection: Canvas vs MedPlum vs Alternatives

‍

Canvas Medical: Full-Featured Certified EMR

‍

Canvas Medical represents the premium option for healthtech companies seeking a production-ready EMR with comprehensive developer extensibility. As a fully ONC 2015 Edition certified platform with HITRUST and SOC 2 Type 2 certifications, Canvas provides immediate compliance benefits while offering robust APIs for customization.

‍

Canvas delivers a complete clinical interface out-of-the-box, including scheduling and calendar management, proprietary Narrative Charting™ for clinical documentation, lab and medication ordering, referral management, and electronic claims submission with integrated billing. The platform's collaborative workflow features support task assignments and results reporting across care teams.

‍

Strengths and Pricing Considerations

‍

Canvas excels in providing production-ready EMR functionality from day one, eliminating the need to build core clinical modules from scratch. The platform's existing ONC certification covers required capabilities like e-prescribing, clinical decision support, and data export—critical for practices seeking federal program compliance.

‍

Canvas pricing starts around $3,950 per month for the startup-focused "Builder" plan, which supports unlimited users and approximately 1,000 active patients. This represents excellent value for a fully certified EMR platform, especially considering it includes comprehensive support for security, infrastructure, and ongoing regulatory updates that would otherwise require significant internal resources.

‍

Extensibility and API Capabilities

‍

Canvas is designed for extension rather than replacement, offering SDKs that allow developers to build custom modules and UI components that integrate seamlessly with existing workflows. The platform exposes FHIR APIs for data interoperability, enabling integration with external applications and data exchanges.

‍

This "decoupled EHR" architecture allows teams to use Canvas's full interface or build custom experiences while leveraging its compliance and clinical foundations. Many digital health companies use Canvas as their backend while creating customized patient and provider experiences optimized for their specific care models.

‍

MedPlum: Open-Source Headless Healthcare Platform

‍

MedPlum takes a fundamentally different approach as an open-source, FHIR-native healthcare developer platform. Rather than providing a pre-built clinical interface, MedPlum offers backend infrastructure and data layers accessible entirely through APIs, allowing complete frontend customization.

‍

MVP Strategy and Long-term Considerations

‍

MedPlum excels for MVP development and early-stage validation, enabling rapid prototyping without significant upfront investment. As an open-source platform, it allows quick testing of healthcare workflows and clinical concepts while providing the flexibility to migrate to custom infrastructure as companies scale.

‍

For early-stage healthtech companies, MedPlum's approach enables market validation and clinical workflow testing while handling authentication, authorization, audit logging, and compliance requirements automatically. However, plan for potential migration to custom systems optimized for specific performance and integration requirements as you reach enterprise scale.

‍

Developer-First Architecture

‍

MedPlum stores all healthcare data in native FHIR R4 format, eliminating complex ETL processes and enabling seamless interoperability. The platform includes comprehensive backend services: role-based access control with audit trails, built-in automation engine for serverless functions ("bots"), and integration capabilities through standard APIs.

‍

The platform provides React component libraries built with Mantine UI for common healthcare interfaces—patient registration, basic charting, scheduling widgets—serving as customizable starting points rather than fixed interfaces. MedPlum can be used through their managed cloud service (starting around $2,000/month for production) or self-hosted using provided infrastructure scripts.

‍

Alternative EMR Platforms

‍

Oyster Health and Aidbox

‍

Oyster Health (OystEHR) offers a developer-first headless EHR platform with FHIR R4/R5 APIs and usage-based pricing without large upfront fees. Oyster emphasizes transparent pricing and includes ONC certification and HIPAA compliance, with "Ottehr" as an open-source frontend reference implementation in React/Node.js.

‍

Aidbox by Health Samurai provides FHIR Backend-as-a-Service with modular add-ons including form builders, master patient index, and analytics. While offering proven FHIR server capabilities, Aidbox has a smaller community ecosystem compared to MedPlum's growing open-source presence.

‍

Traditional Options: Elation Health and DrChrono

‍

Elation Health focuses on primary care with comprehensive APIs and developer sandbox access, including integrated e-prescribing for controlled substances. Pricing typically runs $400-500 per provider per month for core EHR functionality.

‍

DrChrono (now part of Commure) offers all-in-one EHR and practice management with robust APIs, particularly known for early iPad-based EMR adoption. Both platforms represent "buy and lightly integrate" approaches with less customization than headless solutions but proven clinical workflows.

‍

ONC Certification Strategy and Federal Compliance

‍

Understanding 2015 Edition Cures Update Requirements

‍

ONC Health IT Certification remains mandatory for EMR systems serving Medicare and Medicaid-participating providers. The current "2015 Edition Cures Update" criteria encompasses functional, technical, and security requirements including clinical documentation, interoperability, patient engagement, and information blocking prevention.

‍

The 21st Century Cures Act significantly expanded requirements around patient data access and information blocking prevention. Your EMR must support standardized API access to patient data, implement consent management, and provide comprehensive patient access to health information without creating artificial barriers.

‍

FHIR API Requirements (§170.315(g)(10))

‍

The API certification criteria mandate exposing patient data through standardized FHIR R4 APIs without special effort from patients or providers. Implementation requires OAuth 2.0 authentication, SMART on FHIR application support, and access to the United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI) data set.

‍

Your API implementation must support both patient-facing and provider-facing applications with appropriate security controls and comprehensive audit logging. Consider early how third-party developers will integrate with your platform and invest in robust API documentation and developer tools.

‍

Clinical Documentation and CPOE

‍

Core certification requirements include structured recording of problems, medications, and allergies, plus computerized physician order entry (CPOE) for medications, labs, and imaging orders. Clinical decision support implementation must include basic decision support rules and drug interaction checking.

‍

Certification Timeline and Authorized Testing Labs

‍

ONC certification typically requires 12-18 months from initial application to final certification. The process includes 3-6 months for technical testing with an ONC-Authorized Testing Laboratory (ATL), several months for remediation and retesting, and additional time for ONC review.

‍

Budget $150,000-$500,000 for complete certification including ATL fees, remediation work, and internal engineering resources. Choose ATLs with experience in modern, API-first EMR systems and cloud-native applications to ensure smooth testing processes.

‍

Leveraging Pre-Certified Platforms

‍

Significantly accelerate certification by building on already-certified platforms like Canvas Medical or leveraging "ONC Certification as a Service" offerings from platforms like Oyster Health. This approach can reduce certification timeline to 6-12 months rather than 24-36 months required for ground-up development.

‍

When building on certified platforms, focus custom development on unique clinical workflows and patient experience while leveraging existing certification for core EMR functionality. This strategy enables faster market entry while maintaining compliance and interoperability requirements.

‍

Revenue Cycle Integration and Claims Processing

‍

Modern Clearinghouse APIs: Stedi vs Traditional

‍

Revenue cycle integration requires sophisticated claims processing capabilities that handle insurance submission, eligibility verification, and payment posting across thousands of payers. Modern API-first clearinghouses significantly simplify development compared to traditional EDI file-based approaches.

‍

Stedi's API-First Approach

‍

Stedi represents the new generation of healthcare clearinghouses with RESTful JSON APIs that eliminate complex EDI file handling. Stedi supports electronic claims submission (837 files) for professional, institutional, and dental services to over 2,700 payers including Medicare MACs and Medicaid agencies.

‍

Key capabilities include real-time eligibility checks (270/271 transactions) supporting over 1,200 payers, claim status updates and Electronic Remittance Advice (ERA) processing, and automated claim edits to improve acceptance rates. Stedi provides multi-region failover for reliability and maintains HIPAA and SOC 2 Type 2 certifications.

‍

Alternative Clearinghouse Options

‍

Traditional clearinghouses like Change Healthcare and TriZetto offer broad payer connections but typically use older SOAP APIs or SFTP file transfers. Availity provides web portals and some API offerings, while newer entrants like Candid Health focus on modern API-driven approaches.

‍

Prior Authorization Integration

‍

Availity for Blues Plans

‍

Prior authorization requirements vary significantly by payer and often require payer-specific integration approaches. For Blue Cross Blue Shield plans, integrate with Availity, which handles prior authorization processing for most Blues plans due to their ownership stake in the platform.

‍

Availity's prior authorization APIs support electronic submission and status tracking for BCBS networks, streamlining approval workflows that traditionally required manual phone calls or fax submissions.

‍

UnitedHealthcare API Strategy

‍

UnitedHealthcare provides comprehensive APIs through their UHC Provider Portal supporting electronic prior authorization and real-time benefit verification. Their APIs offer standardized interfaces for prior authorization submission, status checking, and approval notifications.

‍

Other major payers often work through platforms like CoverMyMeds or require direct integration with proprietary systems. Build workflow tools that minimize provider burden while ensuring compliance across different payer requirements.

‍

E-Prescribing Integration with Surescripts

‍

Surescripts provides the backbone for electronic prescribing in the United States, connecting EMRs with pharmacy networks and offering prescription benefit information. Integration enables real-time prescription benefit checks, medication history queries, and electronic prior authorization processing.

‍

Plan for Surescripts certification as part of your compliance strategy—most commercial payers and government programs require Surescripts connectivity for electronic prescribing incentives and quality programs. The certification process involves testing e-prescribing workflows and maintaining ongoing compliance with network requirements.

‍

Essential Laboratory and Imaging Integrations

‍

LabCorp and Quest Diagnostics APIs

‍

Laboratory integration typically involves multiple API approaches depending on volume and technical requirements. LabCorp offers their Developer API for order management and result retrieval, while Quest Diagnostics provides the Quanum API suite for comprehensive lab integration.

‍

For streamlined multi-lab connectivity, consider integration platforms like Health Gorilla, which aggregates multiple laboratory networks into unified APIs, supporting both LabCorp and Quest alongside regional labs. This approach simplifies integration complexity while providing broader laboratory coverage.

‍

For high-volume practices, direct HL7 integration through health information exchanges or lab networks may be preferable. Smaller practices benefit from simplified integration through platforms like Redox or Human API that aggregate multiple lab providers into unified APIs.

‍

Health Information Exchange Integration

‍

Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) facilitate broader interoperability beyond individual lab relationships. Many regional HIEs support FHIR-based data exchange and can provide access to hospital records, imaging results, and clinical summaries from other providers.

‍

Consider integration with national networks like Commonwell Health Alliance or Carequality for broader interoperability coverage, particularly important for practices serving patients who receive care across multiple health systems.

‍

DICOM Handling for Specialty Practices

‍

Medical imaging integration is only necessary if your practice model includes diagnostic imaging, radiology interpretation, or specialties requiring image review. Many primary care and specialty practices operate effectively without DICOM capabilities.

‍

When imaging integration is required, cloud-based solutions like Ambra Health or Intelerad provide better scalability than on-premise systems. These platforms offer API integration with EMRs and eliminate extensive radiology IT infrastructure requirements.

‍

Technology Architecture for National Scale

‍

Frontend Development with Modern Frameworks

‍

Modern clinical interfaces can be built with any contemporary frontend framework including React, Vue.js, Angular, or Svelte. The key is choosing technologies that support component-based architecture and handle complex state management required for clinical workflows.

‍

Design component libraries around clinical workflows rather than generic UI patterns—think "clinical note editor" and "medication reconciliation widget" rather than standard forms and tables. Healthcare interfaces require different interaction patterns than consumer applications, emphasizing rapid data entry, comprehensive information display, and error prevention.

‍

FHIR-Native Backend Implementation

‍

FHIR R4 becomes essential when building modern EMR systems from scratch, providing standardized data models and APIs that enable seamless integration with the broader healthcare ecosystem. While legacy EMR systems struggle with FHIR retrofitting, new builds leverage FHIR-native architecture for simplified development and automatic interoperability compliance.

‍

Resource Modeling and Custom Extensions

‍

Start by mapping clinical workflows to FHIR resources: patient demographics become Patient resources, clinical encounters become Encounter resources, and medications become MedicationRequest and MedicationStatement resources. This mapping exercise identifies gaps in standard FHIR resources and areas requiring custom extensions.

‍

Use FHIR extensions judiciously—over-customization complicates interoperability and increases maintenance burden. Work with FHIR experts to design extensions that align with emerging industry patterns and consider contributing back to the community when possible.

‍

Integration Layer Design

‍

Your integration layer should abstract the complexity of different healthcare systems while maintaining FHIR compliance. This typically involves building adapters for legacy systems without native FHIR support, implementing data transformation pipelines for different clinical data formats, and maintaining mappings between internal data models and external system requirements.

‍

Consider event-driven architecture with message queues for asynchronous processing of clinical data updates, lab results, and administrative transactions. This approach improves system resilience and enables real-time clinical decision support.

‍

Multi-Tenant Architecture Planning

‍

Multi-tenant architecture enables scaling across multiple practice locations while maintaining operational efficiency and security isolation. Design tenant isolation carefully to ensure HIPAA compliance while maximizing resource sharing and cost efficiency.

‍

Build configuration systems that allow tenant-specific workflow customization without requiring code changes or separate deployments. Consider how different practices might have varying integration needs, documentation requirements, and billing workflows.

‍

Provider Credentialing and Multi-State Licensing

‍

CAQH ProView and Medallion Integration

‍

Healthcare provider licensing affects how your EMR handles provider credentials, scope of practice validation, and clinical documentation requirements. Build flexibility into provider management systems to accommodate different licensing requirements and credentialing processes across states.

‍

Integrate with provider credentialing services like CAQH ProView, which maintains primary source verification for provider credentials, or specialized platforms like Medallion that automate credentialing processes for modern healthcare practices. These integrations reduce administrative burden and ensure compliance with state licensing requirements.

‍

Corporate Practice of Medicine Compliance

‍

Corporate practice of medicine laws vary significantly by state and impact how you structure your EMR platform and business model. Some states prohibit corporations from directly employing physicians, requiring management service organization (MSO) structures that affect EMR workflow design and data access patterns.

‍

Work with healthcare attorneys familiar with your target states to understand how corporate practice restrictions might affect EMR architecture and user management systems. Plan for different organizational structures and data segregation requirements across states.

‍

Interstate Compact Considerations

‍

The Interstate Medical Licensure Compact and nursing licensure compact change how providers practice across state lines, but telehealth regulations remain complex and state-specific. Your EMR should track provider licenses, validate scope of practice for telehealth encounters, and support different documentation requirements for cross-state care delivery.

‍

Build geofencing capabilities to ensure providers only see patients in states where they're licensed to practice, and implement automated alerts for license renewals and compliance requirements.

‍

Infrastructure, Security, and Compliance Costs

‍

HIPAA-Compliant Hosting Options

‍

Healthcare applications require HIPAA-compliant hosting environments with Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) from cloud providers. Major cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, GCP) offer BAA support, but you may need robust configurations including dedicated instances and enhanced encryption.

‍

Aptible vs AWS/Azure with BAA

‍

Specialized HIPAA Platform-as-a-Service providers like Aptible offer ready-made compliance features including encryption, logging, and monitoring at a premium. Aptible production plans start around $999/month for basic deployments, scaling with usage.

‍

Alternative providers like Healthcare Blocks offer startup packages starting at $170/month for minimal resources and growth packages at $1,065/month. Traditional cloud providers require more configuration but offer greater flexibility and potentially lower costs at scale.

‍

Cost Planning by Development Stage

‍

For MVP/early-stage EMR serving pilot clinics, expect $1,000-$2,000 monthly for compliant hosting and monitoring. As you scale to national coverage with multiple clients, infrastructure costs grow to $10,000+ monthly for multi-region, scaled-out deployments.

‍

Include costs for security monitoring tools ($200-$1,000 monthly), backup and disaster recovery storage ($100-$500 monthly), and support staffing or managed service providers ($0-$5,000 monthly depending on scale and internal capabilities).

‍

SOC 2 Type II vs HITRUST Certification

‍

SOC 2 Type II certification demonstrates commitment to security, availability, and confidentiality controls and is typically sufficient for most healthtech companies. HITRUST certification is generally unnecessary unless specifically required by large enterprise customers during RFP processes—it's often used more as a sales tool than a practical security requirement.

‍

Start SOC 2 preparation early by implementing security controls as standard development practices rather than retrofitting later. Work with experienced auditors who understand healthcare technology requirements and can guide control implementation effectively.

‍

Business Associate Agreement Strategy

‍

Every vendor that processes PHI requires a HIPAA Business Associate Agreement (BAA), regardless of how peripheral their service might seem. This includes obvious services like cloud hosting and analytics platforms, but extends to communication tools—for example, sharing PHI through Slack requires a BAA with Slack.

‍

Maintain comprehensive inventories of all services that might encounter PHI and ensure current BAAs are in place before production deployment. Consider how BAA requirements affect choices of development tools, monitoring services, customer support platforms, and code repositories that might contain PHI in log files or configuration data.

‍

Quality Reporting and Population Health

‍

CMS Quality Payment Program Integration

‍

The Quality Payment Program affects most healthcare providers and requires comprehensive quality measure reporting. For MIPS reporting, platforms like Canvas Medical often include built-in quality measure calculation and reporting capabilities. If building custom solutions, consider specialized quality reporting platforms like Apervita or Quality Insights.

‍

HEDIS Reporting for Value-Based Care

‍

HEDIS reporting for value-based care contracts typically requires specialized software beyond basic EMR capabilities. Many EMR platforms don't include comprehensive HEDIS capabilities, making third-party solutions like Cotiviti or HealthEC necessary for practices participating in Medicare Advantage or Medicaid managed care contracts.

‍

Evaluate whether your chosen EMR platform includes quality reporting capabilities or if separate solutions are needed for CMS and payer-specific quality programs.

‍

Leveraging Existing Analytics Platforms

‍

Building custom population health analytics is typically unnecessary for most healthtech companies, as existing EMR platforms and specialized population health vendors provide comprehensive capabilities. Canvas Medical includes population health dashboards, while standalone solutions like Arcadia Analytics offer sophisticated population management tools.

‍

Focus development resources on clinical workflows and patient experience rather than rebuilding population health analytics available through established platforms. Most practices benefit more from integration with existing population health tools than custom-built analytics systems.

‍

Development Strategy: Build vs Buy vs Hybrid

‍

MVP Path Using Pre-Built Components

‍

The traditional build-versus-buy decision has evolved into a hybrid approach leveraging headless EMR platforms as foundations, building custom workflows on FHIR-native backends, and integrating specialized services for clinical decision support, quality reporting, and revenue cycle management.

‍

This approach allows focus on unique value propositions while ensuring regulatory compliance and interoperability. As one healthcare technology expert noted, headless EHRs provide "Firebase for healthcare" capabilities, where teams build UI/UX while platforms handle data, FHIR compliance, and infrastructure requirements.

‍

Budget Planning: $500K vs $2-3M Development

‍

Budget $500,000 for EMR development when building on strong foundational components like Canvas Medical or MedPlum, focusing investment on custom workflows and user experience. Ground-up development typically costs $2-3 million depending on feature scope and compliance requirements.

‍

The key is maximizing use of existing certified components and third-party services rather than rebuilding healthcare infrastructure from scratch. Focus budget on unique value propositions of your practice model rather than recreating standard EMR functionality.

‍

Focus on Core Differentiators

‍

Successful healthtech companies identify which aspects of EMR functionality represent core innovation opportunities versus commodity capabilities. Use off-the-shelf solutions for commodity features like basic clinical documentation and billing, while investing development resources in areas that differentiate your care model.

‍

For example, if building a telehealth-focused primary care platform, leverage existing EMR foundations for clinical documentation while building custom telemedicine workflows and patient engagement tools optimized for virtual care delivery.

‍

Scaling Strategy and Market Focus

‍

Internal Excellence Over White-Label Distribution

‍

Rather than offering your EMR as a white-label solution, concentrate on building exceptional capabilities for your own healthcare delivery model. This approach allows deeper integration between clinical protocols and technology platforms while avoiding complexity of supporting diverse external customer requirements.

‍

White-label offerings can distract from core product development and dilute focus on clinical excellence. Many successful healthcare companies, including those that inspired platforms in the EMR space, started by perfecting internal operations before expanding technology offerings.

‍

Multi-Practice Expansion Planning

‍

Multi-tenant architecture enables scaling across multiple practice locations while maintaining operational efficiency. Design tenant isolation carefully to ensure security and compliance while maximizing resource sharing and cost efficiency.

‍

Focus on building world-class EMR capabilities that enable rapid expansion of your own practice network rather than supporting external organizations with different clinical philosophies and operational requirements.

‍

Conclusion

‍

Building a scalable EMR for tech-enabled healthcare requires strategic platform selection, comprehensive compliance planning, and disciplined focus on core differentiators. Success depends on leveraging existing certified platforms and specialized services while investing development resources in unique clinical workflows and patient experiences that drive competitive advantage.

‍

The modern approach combines headless EMR platforms like Canvas Medical or MedPlum with specialized integrations for laboratory results, prescription processing, and claims management. This strategy enables rapid market entry while maintaining regulatory compliance and interoperability standards essential for national scale.

‍

Most importantly, avoid the temptation to rebuild healthcare infrastructure from scratch unless absolutely necessary for your clinical model. Focus on perfecting patient outcomes and provider experience within your own practice network before considering broader technology distribution strategies.

‍

The healthcare technology landscape continues evolving rapidly, making architectural flexibility and standards compliance essential for long-term success. By following the strategic framework outlined in this guide, healthtech companies can build EMR platforms that support sustainable growth while maintaining focus on clinical excellence and patient care.

‍

Frequently Asked Questions

‍

1. Should I choose Canvas Medical or MedPlum for my healthtech startup's EMR foundation?

‍

‍Choose Canvas Medical if you need production-ready clinical interfaces immediately and can justify $3,950+ monthly costs for comprehensive certified EMR functionality. Choose MedPlum if you have strong development capabilities and want maximum customization flexibility starting around $2,000/month for production, with the understanding you may need to migrate to custom infrastructure at enterprise scale. Canvas accelerates time-to-market with proven workflows, while MedPlum offers developer control for unique clinical experiences.

‍

2. How can I accelerate ONC certification timeline from 24-36 months to 6-12 months?

‍

‍Build on already-certified platforms like Canvas Medical or leverage "ONC Certification as a Service" offerings from platforms like Oyster Health. This approach inherits existing certification for core EMR functionality while allowing custom development for unique workflows. Focus certification efforts on custom modules and integrations rather than rebuilding basic clinical documentation, FHIR APIs, and e-prescribing capabilities that certified platforms already provide.

‍

3. What's the realistic total cost for building an EMR using modern platform components?

‍

‍Budget $500,000 for comprehensive EMR development using strong foundational components like Canvas or MedPlum, focusing investment on custom workflows and user experience. This includes platform licensing, essential integrations (Stedi for claims, Surescripts for e-prescribing), HIPAA-compliant hosting, and development resources. Ground-up development typically costs $2-3 million, making platform-based approaches significantly more cost-effective for most healthtech companies.

‍

4. Which clearinghouse should I integrate with for national claims processing?

‍

‍Stedi offers the most modern API-first approach with RESTful JSON APIs supporting over 2,700 payers for claims and 1,200 payers for eligibility verification. Their developer-friendly approach eliminates complex EDI file handling while providing comprehensive coverage. Alternative options include Change Healthcare and TriZetto for broad payer connections, though they typically use older SOAP APIs or SFTP file transfers that complicate development.

‍

5. Should I build population health analytics capabilities or use existing platforms?

‍

‍Use existing platforms rather than building custom population health analytics. Canvas Medical includes built-in population health dashboards, while specialized solutions like Arcadia Analytics offer sophisticated population management tools. Focus development resources on clinical workflows and patient experience rather than rebuilding analytics capabilities available through established platforms. Most practices benefit more from integration with proven population health tools than custom-built systems.

‍