Most Agentic AI Isn’t Ready. You Should Still Ship It.

What product teams can do when complex systems fall short of the hype. This article is part of a broader series on how product and engineering can build more reliable AI together. For the engineering side, read why most agentic AI projects fail.

‍

There’s a quiet pressure in AI development to wait. Wait for the model to improve. Wait until the errors go away. Wait until it’s “ready.”

‍

But when the model is agentic—when it’s making a series of decisions and calling tools to act on them—waiting can feel like the only option. These systems are fragile. Every step adds risk. Every decision compounds the chance of failure. And engineering can only do so much to contain that.

‍

Product, on the other hand, has a different lever: trust. Not blind trust, but perceptual trust. Clear boundaries. Scoped expectations. Human control.

‍

A 95 percent accurate system can still feel like five nines if you design around its limitations.

‍

Reliability is an experience, not a number

‍

Engineering measures accuracy. Users experience confidence.

‍

They don’t see decimal points. They see whether a feature feels usable or unpredictable. Whether it’s easy to spot when something went wrong. Whether they’re in control when the system takes action.

‍

That means reliability isn't something we wait for. It’s something we design.

‍

You don’t need perfect autonomy to ship something real

‍

Most agentic systems won’t be able to fully operate on their own anytime soon. That doesn’t mean they’re useless. It means we need to design systems that can follow clear workflows, choose between defined actions, and hand things off when needed, without pretending they’re fully autonomous.

‍

That starts with product. Not just scoping the model’s role, but shaping the experience around what it's good at—and giving users a clear path to review, correct, or opt out.

‍

This is where product should work closely with our engineers to define exactly where the model needs guardrails, where the user needs visibility, and what failure modes we can mitigate through design rather than code. If engineering owns traceability and constraint, product can own pacing, framing, and the trust-building layer that makes early-stage systems feel safe to use.

‍

What we can do when the model isn’t “ready”

• You can scope early use to the model’s strongest capabilities.
• You can filter outputs to only show confident recommendations.
• You can give users context, editing rights, and override control.
• You can start with review workflows and add automation later.
• You can treat the first release as a feedback loop, not a launch.
• You can be honest about the system’s limits and still earn trust.

‍

All of this helps people use the system now, not just someday.

‍

Conversations worth having this week

• Who needs to trust this, and what does trust look like for them?
• How does this compare to the reliability of systems they already use?
• Is adoption top-down or voluntary, and how does that change what users need to feel safe using it?
• Which parts of the model are dependable enough to ship now?
• What’s our mechanism for feedback, and who’s acting on it?

‍

You don’t need perfect autonomy to create a product that works.

‍

You just need product and engineering in the room early, solving the right problem together.